We recommend that the following prayer, based on the words of the hymn, the ‘Dies irae’, should be said continuously for all those involved in the practice of abortion.

Day of wrath! O day of mourning! See fulfilled the prophets’ warning,
Heaven and earth in ashes burning!

Oh, what fear man’s bosom rendeth, when from heaven the Judge descendeth,
on whose sentence all dependeth.

Wondrous sound the trumpet flingeth; through earth’s sepulchres it ringeth;
all before the throne it bringeth.

Death is struck, and nature quaking, all creation is awaking,
to its Judge an answer making.

Lo! the book, exactly worded, wherein all hath been recorded:
thence shall judgment be awarded.

When the Judge his seat attaineth, and each hidden deed arraigneth,
nothing unavenged remaineth.

What shall I, frail man, be pleading? Who for me be interceding,
when the just are mercy needing?

King of Majesty tremendous, who dost free salvation send us,
Fount of pity, then befriend us!

Think, good Jesu, my salvation caused thy wondrous Incarnation;
leave me not to reprobation!

Faint and weary, thou hast sought me, on the cross of suffering bought me.
shall such grace be vainly brought me?

Righteous Judge! for sin’s pollution grant thy gift of absolution,
ere the day of retribution.

Guilty, now I pour my moaning, all my shame with anguish owning;
spare, O God, thy suppliant groaning!

Thou the sinful woman savedst; thou the dying thief forgavest;
and to me a hope vouchsafest.

Worthless are my prayers and sighing, yet, good Lord, in grace complying,
rescue me from fires undying!

With thy favoured sheep O place me; nor among the goats abase me;
but to thy right hand upraise me.

While the wicked are confounded, doomed to flames of woe unbounded
call me with thy saints surrounded.

Low I kneel, with heart-submission, see, like ashes, my contrition;
help me in my last condition.

Ah! that day of tears and mourning! From the dust of earth returning
man for judgment must prepare him; Spare, O God, in mercy spare him!

Lord, all pitying, Jesu blest,
grant them Thine eternal rest. Amen.

When the legislation was being discussed those in favour of it said it would save some mothers from the dangers of what has become known as “back-street abortions”. We question if this has in fact been the case. On almost every electricity pole along the streets of our cities and towns there are advertisements for ‘safe and painless’ abortions. They are outside the Head Office of the Department of Health in Pretoria and on the boundary walls of our schools. If the advertising is so public and so widespread, then the demand for those” back-street abortions” must be high.

The position of the Catholic Church on abortion is clear and unambiguous .Just because the law says it is legal does not make it morally right. Each unborn child is created by God, “knit together in (its) mother’s womb” (Ps139.13) .That unborn child is a human being with a human life that must be protected. He or she has a right to life, a right that must be respected by the mother and protected by the state.

Another right that must be respected by the state and its agents is that of conscientious objection. Those who believe that abortion is morally wrong have a right to refuse to participate in the medical procedures.

All of us, parents, teachers, members of the Church, must understand what a young girl is going through when she realizes she is pregnant. She needs our love, our support, our understanding and sometimes our forgiveness. We in the Church are committed to helping unmarried pregnant girls and couples tempted to take the abortion route in whatever way we can. We will never condemn, just as Jesus refused to condemn (John8.11)

As we remember the many children who have been aborted since February 1997, we also remember the mothers of these children. Just as we do not condemn a pregnant young girl, we do not condemn her if she made the mistake of procuring an abortion. Only she knows how much she has suffered as a result. She needs help and healing. We invite her to come and speak to one of our priests or counselors so that we can be part of reconciling her to God and bringing about healing.

Archbishop Buti Tlhagale, OMI,

On behalf of the Southern African Catholic Bishops’ Conference 30th January 2012

On Our Civic Responsibility for the Common Good

 See the letter by clicking here.

As a result of the Papal encyclical, Humanae Vitae, most Catholics know that all forms of artificial birth control are forbidden by the Catholic Church. However, many Catholics are not aware of the vast and crucially important distinction between CONTRACEPTIVE birth control, which involves the use of contraceptives only which prevent new life being formed, and ABORTIFACIENT birth control, which involves the use of abortifacients, which destroy new life after its formation.

Contraceptives prevent the male sperm from fertilising the female egg. This fertilisation is known as ‘conception’, which, according to irrefutable scientific and medical evidence, results in the immediate commencement of the new human life. Contraceptives include sterilisation and also the so-called ‘barrier’ methods: the condom, the diaphragm, and the cervical cap; and the anti-sperm methods such as the sponge, jellies, foams and creams.

Abortifacients, however, actually cause early abortions, and to put it bluntly, all kill pre-born children. They prevent the continued existence in the womb of the fertilised egg, the new human life, and thereby cause little sons and daughters to die.

 Abortifacients include: the Pill, which has both contraceptive and abortifacient functions: the I.U.D, (intra-uterine device), an abortifacient only: Norplant, a series of capsules implanted under the skin, which has both contraceptive and abortifacient functions: Depo Provera, an injection received at three-monthly intervals, which also has both contraceptive and abortifacient functions: and the RU 486 drug, an abortifacient only, and aptly termed a ‘human pesticide’.

However, ‘THE PILL’, the collective term for all the birth control drugs, is probably the most insidious abortifacient as its users usually intend contraception only, and are unaware of its (unpredictable and undetectable) abortive potential, soon after (accidental) conception.

Thus, while contraceptives prevent the actual creation of the new human life in the womb, abortifacients in fact destroy this new life after its creation, and very few forms of artificial birth control are only contraceptive, and not also abortifacient in nature.

This brief summary does NOT attempt to justify contraceptive, as opposed to abortifacient birth control on the basis that the former is the lesser evil: it DOES, however try to illustrate, especially to those persons using abortifacients in ignorance of their tragic results, the extremely serious consequences of abortifacient birth control generally. Damian McLeish. March 2011

 (Wolfgang will be in Durban from 8-14 Feb. and is available for speaking engagements there – contact us if you would like to host a talk)

 SPEAKING SCHEDULE FOR CAPE TOWN AND JOHANNESBURG

Tuesday 15 February: (Cape Town)

Time:5.00pm

Venue: St Stephens, Rocklands

Protection of unborn children: What everyone can do to save the life of a baby! 

Contact: Sally 0822550473

Wednesday 16 February: (Cape Town)

Time: 07.00pm

Venue: St Mary of the Angels, Athlone

Contact: Sally 0822550473

Saturday 19 and Sunday 20 February: (Cape Town)

Pro-Life Retreat Weekend,

Time: 10.00am to 3.00pm

Venue: Mater Domini Home (formerly House Sion) 10 1^st Avenue Claremont

Including: Love- and Lifestyle of the modern western world: Blessing or Curse for me and my country? 

Steps of Grace: The healing from Post Abortion Syndrome (PAS) – (important for priests and counsellors)

Love and Contraception – Unborn Life and abortion: How can I find “My Way” to a fulfilled and free life?

Culture of Life – Culture of death: Quo Vadis, Africa?  

Good future for Germany? – How could it happen, that in the Christian heart of Europe about 1000 Unborn Children have to die every working day?

Contact: Sally 0822550473

Tuesday, 22^nd February: (Johannesburg)

How the Rosary prayer stops abortion on all continents

Time: 7.30p.m.

Venue: Our Lady of the Cedars, Woodmead.

This will be at a charismatic group for the beginning of their Life in the Spirit Seminar.  

Contact – Alice Grotta 072 4422453

Wednesday, 23^rd February (Johannesburg)

Western Europe said “No” to Life. The fruits of rejecting “Humanae vitae”

Time: 7.00p.m.

Venue: St Augustine’s Catholic University, Victory Park

Contact – Jenny Harrington 072 673 2521

Thursday, 24^th February (Johannesburg)

The beauty and holiness of every life

Time: 11.00a.m.

Venue: St Benedict’s College.

The matriculants of 3 Catholic schools will be gathering for mass and lunch. Wolfgang will address them for 40 minutes after lunch at approximately 12 noon.

Contact Grant Hanouch 083 235 7184

Thursday, 24^th February (Johannesburg)

“The Culture of Life – Culture of Death”

Time: 7.00 for 7.30p.m.

Venue: The Cathedral of Christ the King

Duration 40 min. Contact Fr Shaun von Lillienfeld

Friday 25^th February (Cape Town)

Saving Lives and souls for God: the Sidewalk Counselling in front of abortion “clinics”. (Workshop)

Time: 12.00pm to 3.00pm

Venue: Mater Domini Home (formerly House Sion) 10 1^st Avenue Claremont

Contact: Sally 0822550473

Saturday 26^th February (Cape Town)

LARGE PRAYER VIGIL, led by Fr Telford Bray, from Salesian Institute, Greenpoint,. To Marie Stopes Clinic in Bree Street. Starts with Mass at 9.30am

Followed by talk by Wolfgang How the Rosary prayer stops abortion on all continents: 20 years “Helpers of God’s Precious Infants”

Time: 12.00pm

Venue: Salesian Institute,

PLEASE CONTACT US IF YOU WOULD LIKE WOLFGANG TO SPEAK TO YOUR GROUP OR PARISH IN FEBRUARY.

Cost: Free (Donations to cover costs welcome)

ALL WELCOME.

In October, Barack Obama signed a new law that prohibits the U.S. government from referring to the “mentally retarded” in any of its laws and regulations. The term to be used instead is “intellectual disability.” Given the harshness with which it strikes the ear, the word “retarded” has long since dropped out of common usage, but it still survives in official policies.

The law is called Rosa’s Law, after a nine-year-old Maryland girl with Down’s syndrome. Her official classification at school was “mentally retarded,” which struck her mother as hurtful. The U.S. Congress passed the law in response to Rosa’s case, but also in response to a long campaign by the Special Olympics to end the use of the “R-Word,” as their campaign puts it.

Timothy Shriver, president of the Special Olympics, was on hand with several special Olympians for the signing ceremony. All of which brought to mind another White House ceremony—the one in which President Reagan conferred on Eunice Kennedy Shriver, Timothy’s mother and founder of the Special Olympics, the Medal of Freedom. It was 1984, sensibilities were different and the president praised Ms. Shriver for her heroic labor “on behalf of America’s least powerful people, the mentally retarded.” Ms. Shriver—whose character and achievements far surpass those of her more celebrated brothers, JFK, RFK and Teddy—did more than anyone else to bring the mentally disabled out of the shadows and into the light. She long used the language of her day, of course, but latterly campaigned against the use of the R-word. Yet it was her willingness to use it that began to break down the stigma and shame around mental disability.

She wrote a landmark article in 1962—while JFK was president—in The Saturday Evening Post in which she put the matter starkly: “Rosemary [Eunice’s and JFK’s sister] was mentally retarded.” In 1962, the frank admission that there was, in the most glamorous American family, a mentally disabled daughter was a major milestone.

“Like diabetes, deafness, polio or any other misfortune, mental retardation can happen in any family,” she wrote. “It has happened in the families of the poor and the rich, of governors, senators, Nobel Prize-winners, doctors, lawyers, writers, men of genius, presidents of corporations—and the president of the United States.”

It was Eunice’s love for Rosemary that motivated her to improve the lot of the “retarded” children of her time. Six years later she would found the Special Olympics. That 1962 article illustrates the urgent need for her work then, so great was the shame around mental disabilities.

“Even within the last several years, there have been known instances where families have committed retarded infants to institutions before they were a month old—and ran obituaries in the local papers to spread the belief that they were dead,” Ms. Shriver wrote. “In this era of atom-splitting and wonder drugs and technological advance, it is still widely assumed that the future for the mentally retarded is hopeless.”

It’s hard to imagine that parents would send their mentally disabled children away and pretend they were dead, rather than bear the blessed burden of raising them. If Rosa had been born in the 1950s, she would not be in a regular Maryland school, classified—as she is now—as intellectually disabled. She might well have been shuttered in an institution, thought to be dead.

Yet today, Rosa’s situation is even more remarkable. Approximately 90% of all babies diagnosed with Down’s syndrome in the womb are aborted. The technological advances that Ms. Shriver thought would help the mentally disabled are now employed to prevent them from ever seeing the light.

We insist that harsh words are not used in regard to the mentally disabled, but the most lethal words today in medicine are those that announce Down’s syndrome. It is far better to be diagnosed with terminal cancer as an adult than to be diagnosed with Down’s syndrome as an unborn baby. No cancer has a 90% death rate within a month.

In 1962, there were live children and fake obituaries. In 2010, there are dead children and no obituaries. The late Ms. Shriver did not consider that an improvement.

If Rosa is like almost all Down’s syndrome children, she is probably preternaturally gifted at showing love and transmitting joy. Those who know such children would be horrified to speak of them in anything but the gentlest language.

If, that is, they get a chance to speak of them at all.

Fr. Raymond de Souza is a Queen’s Alumnus (BA honors in economics and a master’s degree in public administration). He also holds a master’s degree in economics and politics from the University of Cambridge, England. Subsequently, he began studies for the priesthood, earning a Licence in Sacred Theology from the Santa Croce University in Rome. He was ordained to the priesthood for the Archdiocese of Kingston in July, 2002. Fr. Raymond is a frequent contributor to various publications, including the National Post, The National Catholic Register, and First Things. This article is reprinted with permission of the National Post and Fr. de Souza, and first appeared in the National Post on December 16, 2010. To view this article, visit http://www.nationalpost.com/Retarded+more/3984583/story.html.

Lord Jesus,

You who faithfully visit and fulfill with your Presence
the Church and the history of men;
You who in the miraculous Sacrament of your Body and Blood
render us participants in divine Life
and allow us a foretaste of the joy of eternal Life;
We adore and bless you.

Prostrated before You, source and lover of Life,
truly present and alive among us, we beg you.

Reawaken in us respect for every unborn life,
make us capable of seeing in the fruit of the maternal womb
the miraculous work of the Creator,
open our hearts to generously welcoming every child
that comes into life.

Bless all families,
sanctify the union of spouses,
render fruitful their love.

Accompany the choices of legislative assemblies
with the light of your Spirit,
so that peoples and nations may recognize and respect
the sacred nature of life, of every human life.

Guide the work of scientists and doctors,
so that all progress contributes to the integral well-being of the person,
and no one endures suppression or injustice.

Give creative charity to administrators and economists,
so they may realize and promote sufficient conditions
so that young families can serenely embrace
the birth of new children.

Console the married couples who suffer
because they are unable to have children
and in Your goodness provide for them.

Teach us all to care for orphaned or abandoned children,
so they may experience the warmth of your Charity,
the consolation of your divine Heart.

Together with Mary, Your Mother, the great believer,
in whose womb you took on our human nature,
we wait to receive from You, our Only True Good and Savior,
the strength to love and serve life,
in anticipation of living forever in You,
in communion with the Blessed Trinity.

I have been teaching on sexuality for many decades. When I started, nearly three decades ago, even though promiscuity was in full swing even then, I could generally count on young people agreeing with me that sexual intercourse was meant to be an expression of love. In fact, “making love” was a euphemism for “having sex,” but who says that anymore? When I would speak about “sex” they would naturally think of an act performed by spouses. Some argued that if you were in love and intending to get married, it could be moral to have sex before marriage. Even so, there was also fairly widespread agreement, that if you weren’t ready for babies, you weren’t ready for sex. Few were arguing that it was moral to have any kind of sex.

How things have changed since then! Now, when I speak of “sex” people think of a profoundly pleasurable sexual act that has no connection to love, commitment or babies. Young people are a bit surprised when I maintain there is a natural connection between sex, love, commitment and babies.

Why has this change come about? Well, as I have argued incessantly for years, the introduction of the contraceptive pill changed everything. Suddenly people thought removing the baby making power of the sexual act meant they were free to engage in sex without a second thought about any new life that might be conceived. And then we all went wild. As a result, 41% of babies are now born out of wedlock; one of four pregnancies is aborted; and nearly 70% of all children in the United States grow up in households affected by divorce or unwed pregnancy. Worldwide, millions of people are dying of the HIV. And the media continue to fixate on condoms as a solution to all these problems?

TV morality

I blame the media, and to a great extent, the entertainment world. It is a rare parent who doesn’t find the media to be tremendous threats to forming their children well, especially when it comes to sexual morality. All of us are bombarded daily with seductive sexual imagery and the glorification of sexual immorality, from advertisements to nearly every TV show and any nonanimated film. Some films do show the terrible life consequences of irresponsible sexuality, but most entertainment presents irresponsible sexuality as normative and falsifies the all-too-common consequences.

Why don’t reporters harass script writers and producers and others responsible for what appears in the media, instead of further harassing the Holy Father? Why don’t they ask questions such as, “Aren’t you concerned that the way you portray casual sex as exhilarating and satisfying will lead young people to engage in sex recklessly?” “Don’t you feel responsible to some extent for all the unwed pregnancies, abortions, sexually transmitted infections, broken hearts and broken lives?” This would focus our public debate on how those who create our cultural icons are tearing down family values brick by vital brick.

There is also a dearth of reporting about the consequences of unwed pregnancy for the people involved, for the economy and the culture. There is a lack of reporting about the reality of the homosexual lifestyle; the number of lifetime partners, of anonymous sex, of shortened lifespans. Without full information, people can’t make good choices.

If any food or drug led to the amount of disease, poverty, and general human unhappiness that is caused by reckless sexuality, there would be a full-fledged media campaign attempting to alert people to the danger. Is global warming a worse danger than reckless sexuality, which may be said to create an imbalance in our personal and culture moral “ecosystem”? Is overeating a worse danger than reckless sexuality, resulting as it does in a warped and cynical self-image? Is lack of recycling or oil spills worse than reckless sexuality, which trains us to disrespect and ignore our bodily dignity?

Why can’t the media see what is in truth one of the worse threats to human happiness that lurks right under our noses? Why do they continue to fixate on the Pope and condoms, when the world needs to hear about sexual responsibility? Why?

* * * Janet E. Smith is the Father Michael J. McGivney Chair of Life Ethics at Sacred Heart Major Seminary in Detroit, Michigan. She is the author of “Humanae Vitae: A Generation Later” and “The Right to Privacy,” and editor of “Why Humanae Vitae Was Right: A Reader.”

BURGOS, Spain, July 14, 2010 (LifeSiteNews.com) – The Archbishop of Burgos, Francisco Gil Hellín, has issued a call to Spanish Catholics to resist the country’s new abortion law, which he says is no law at all.

In a statement published on the bishops’ Catholic Information Service, Gil Hellín laments the recent promulgation of the law, an “evil law which is directly opposed to right reason and the most elemental justice. Such is the law that establishes that the Spanish have the right to kill the unborn, as long as they do it before 14 weeks.”

“Let us diagnose it with total clarity: this law is no law, although it is presented as such by some political and legislative bodies. And it isn’t because no one has the right to eliminate an innocent. For that reason, it doesn’t obligate. Even more, it demands a head-on opposition without reservation. Right reason cannot admit as a right the killing of an innocent person.”

The new abortion law, which is being contested before Spain’s Constitutional Tribunal, abolishes penalties for all abortions during the first 14 weeks of pregnancy.  It also allows minors to obtain abortions without parental permission, although they must first inform their parents of their intention to do so.

The archbishop rejects arguments that claim the law is somehow valid because it was passed by the legislature and approved according to the required legal processes.

“It is a fallacy to affirm that this law has been approved by the majority of the Parliament and that this represents the majority of the citizens, or to say that if the Constitutional Tribunal decrees its conformity [with the Constitution] it would be disobedience to oppose it, and would deserve a punishment. The fallacy consists in attributing to politicians, judges, or citizens a right that they don’t have, and no one has the right to legislate that an innocent can be killed.”

“What society would continue if it declared that is the right of citizens to kill innocent persons by majority [vote]? In the best scenario it would be converted into a tyranny, against which upright persons would have to react, according to this advice by Gandhi: ‘As soon as one understands that obeying unjust laws is contrary to his dignity as a man, no tyranny can dominate him.’”

The archbishop’s strong statements were made only days before the Constitutional Tribunal is to decide if the law will be suspended while it is under review.

A previous ruling of the Tribunal in the 1980s decreed that the right to life of the unborn child is paramount except in certain cases, including danger to health, rape, or fetal deformity.